LESSON NOTES · レッスンノート

N4Grammar, one piece at a time · Sep 28, 2026

と vs や: the complete list, and the list that is just some examples

と connects nouns into a complete list: everything you have is named, and nothing else exists. や connects nouns into a partial list: these are just examples, and there are more items you are leaving out. 犬いぬと猫ねこがいます means "there is a dog and a cat, and that's all." 犬いぬや猫ねこがいます means "there's a dog, a cat, and other things too."

Both words translate as "and" in English, which is exactly why this pair trips learners up — English "and" does not distinguish between a closed list and a sample list, but Japanese requires you to pick one or the other every time you connect nouns. Choosing wrong does not just sound slightly off; it can literally promise the listener something that is not true.

The basics

と: the complete, closed list

と links nouns to form an exhaustive list — everything relevant is named, with nothing left out.

かばんの中なかにペンとノートがあります。 — There's a pen and a notebook in the bag. (polite, and nothing else is in there) 兄あにと姉あねがいます。 — I have an older brother and an older sister. (polite, and those are all my older siblings)

If the bag actually also contains a wallet, ペンとノートがあります is technically misleading — と promises the listener that the list is complete.

や: the partial, sample list

や links nouns to form a sample list — a few representative items, with more left unnamed.

かばんの中なかにペンやノートがあります。 — There's a pen, a notebook, and other things in the bag. (polite, an incomplete, illustrative list) 週末しゅうまつは掃除そうじや洗濯せんたくをします。 — On weekends I do things like cleaning and laundry. (polite, examples of chores, not a full list)

や is honest about being incomplete — it explicitly signals "these are just some examples," which is why it appears so often when describing routines, hobbies, or the contents of a bag or fridge, where naming absolutely everything would be tedious or unnecessary. Reasons can stay open the same way: 疲つかれたし、帰かえろう gives one reason and hints at others, and 〜し explains why that sounds more relaxed than 疲つかれたから、帰かえろう.

や〜など: making the incompleteness explicit

Adding など (etc., and so on) after an や list makes the partial nature of the list unmistakable, even though や alone already implies it.

公園こうえんには犬いぬや猫ねこなどがいました。 — There were dogs, cats, and so on at the park. (polite, clearly not an exhaustive list)

など is optional after や — the list is already understood to be partial without it — but adding it removes any possible doubt, especially in writing.

Beyond the basics

と cannot signal "for example"; や always can

Because と promises completeness, it cannot be softened into "for example" the way や naturally can. Trying to use と for a sample list produces a sentence that sounds like a full inventory, even if that was not the intent.

趣味しゅみは読書どくしょと映画えいがです。 — My hobbies are reading and movies. (polite, implies these are literally the only two hobbies) 趣味しゅみは読書どくしょや映画えいがです。 — My hobbies are things like reading and movies. (polite, examples among possibly other hobbies)

The first sentence is a common, natural way to state hobbies precisely — but if the speaker also plays guitar and hikes on weekends, 趣味しゅみは読書どくしょや映画えいがです is the more honest version. や works like a small label: more exists, ask if you want it.

と also connects full sentences and quotes; や does not

と has jobs beyond listing nouns — it also marks quoted speech and thought, and connects clauses in comparisons, none of which や does.

「行いきたくない」と言いいました。 — He said, "I don't want to go." (polite, direct quotation, と marking what was said) 明日あした、雨あめが降ふると思おもいます。 — I think it will rain tomorrow. (polite, と marking a thought)

や is exclusively a noun-listing particle. If you see や doing anything other than connecting two or more nouns, something is off — while と shows up constantly outside of lists, in quotes, thoughts, and conditional forms. For the same "these are just examples" feeling applied to actions instead of nouns, see 〜たり〜たり, which does for verbs what や does for nouns.

The difference in a table

Particle List type What it promises Extra uses
と Complete, closed Nothing else exists Quotes, thoughts, comparisons
や Partial, sample More items exist, unnamed や〜など strengthens this

Using both と and や to be precise about precision

Skilled speakers sometimes combine と and や in the same sentence, using と for a genuinely complete sub-list and や for the larger, looser context around it.

冷蔵庫れいぞうこには牛乳ぎゅうにゅうとチーズ、それにやさいやくだものが少すこし入はいっています。 — In the fridge there's milk and cheese, plus a little bit of vegetables and fruit and so on. (polite, と for the exact two items, や for the looser category after)

This kind of mixing is a strong sign of fluency: it shows the speaker is actively deciding, item by item, whether they are being exhaustive or just giving examples, rather than defaulting to one particle out of habit.

や with みたいな: talking about vague categories

や pairs naturally with vague, example-driven speech in general, including words like なにか (something) and そういう (that kind of), because both are about pointing at a category without listing it completely.

本ほんや雑誌ざっしみたいなものを読よみます。 — I read things like books and magazines. (casual, や plus みたいな doubles down on "this is just an example category")

This layering of や with other softening words is extremely common in casual speech, where speakers rarely want to commit to a fully exhaustive list of anything — the same instinct behind scope-narrowing words like だけ and しか, which also let a speaker avoid over-promising.

Common mistakes

  • Using と when you only mean "for example." 趣味しゅみは読書どくしょと映画えいがです claims those are the only two hobbies; use や if more exist.
  • Using や when the list really is complete. If a form asks for exactly two items and both are known, と is more precise and expected than や.
  • Treating や as sloppy or less correct. や is not a shortcut for lazy speakers — it is the grammatically correct way to signal an intentionally partial list.
  • Trying to use や for quoted speech or thoughts. や only connects nouns; と is required for quotes (と言いいました) and thoughts (と思おもいます).
  • Forgetting that など is optional after や. 犬いぬや猫ねこがいました is already understood as a partial list without など; adding it just makes that extra explicit.

FAQ

Can と ever imply "for example" in casual speech? Not naturally — と consistently signals a closed list. If a speaker means "for example," や is the expected choice, even casually.

Is や only used for two items? No — や can connect any number of items in a sample list: パンやご飯はんやパスタを食たべます lists three examples, with more presumably left out.

Does the order of items matter with と or や? Not grammatically, though speakers often list the most typical or important item first, especially with や's sample lists.

Can I use や for a list of people? Yes: 田中たなかさんや鈴木すずきさんが来きました means "Tanaka, Suzuki, and others came" — a partial list of attendees, not necessarily everyone who showed up.

Why does や so often appear with や〜など? など reinforces what や already implies — that more items exist — and appears especially often in writing, where the extra clarity is worth the two extra characters.

Practice

1. Say "there's a pen and a notebook in the bag," implying nothing else is in there.

Show answer

かばんの中なかにペンとノートがあります。 — と closes the list: only these two items exist in the bag.

2. Say the same sentence implying there are other things in the bag too.

Show answer

かばんの中なかにペンやノートがあります。 — や signals a partial, sample list, with more left unnamed.

3. Say "on weekends I do things like cleaning and laundry" (a partial list of chores).

Show answer

週末しゅうまつは掃除そうじや洗濯せんたくをします。 — や fits naturally here, since chores are being given as examples.

4. Rewrite this to make the incompleteness explicit: 公園こうえんには犬いぬや猫ねこがいました。

Show answer

公園こうえんには犬いぬや猫ねこなどがいました。 — Adding など removes any doubt that the list is only partial.

5. What does 趣味しゅみは読書どくしょと映画えいがです imply about the speaker's hobbies?

Show answer

That reading and movies are the speaker's only two hobbies. — と promises a complete, closed list.

6. Say "he said, 'I don't want to go,'" using the correct particle for a quote.

Show answer

「行いきたくない」と言いいました。 — と marks quoted speech; や cannot be used for quotes.

7. True or false: や can only connect exactly two nouns.

Show answer

False. — や can connect any number of items in a sample list, such as パンやご飯はんやパスタ.

8. Fix this sentence if it's wrong: 明日あした、雨あめが降ふるや思おもいます。

Show answer

明日あした、雨あめが降ふると思おもいます。 — や cannot connect a thought to 思おもいます; と is required outside noun lists.

9. Say "Tanaka, Suzuki, and others came," implying it wasn't necessarily everyone.

Show answer

田中たなかさんや鈴木すずきさんが来きました。 — や marks this as a partial list of the people who came.

10. Which particle should you use if a form asks for exactly two specific items and both are known?

Show answer

と. — For a genuinely complete, known list of exactly the right items, と is more precise than や.

A list sounds complete or open depending on と or や, so describe your bag, your family or your weekend in a trial lesson and decide aloud which promise you mean to make.

Vocabulary from this article

Tap the block to select all of it, then copy. In Anki: File → Import, note type Basic, separator Tab — the first column becomes the front, the second the back.

かばん	かばん — bag
ペン	ペン — pen
ノート	ノート — notebook
兄	あに — older brother
姉	あね — older sister
週末	しゅうまつ — weekend
掃除	そうじ — cleaning
洗濯	せんたく — laundry
公園	こうえん — park
趣味	しゅみ — hobby
読書	どくしょ — reading
映画	えいが — movie
冷蔵庫	れいぞうこ — refrigerator
牛乳	ぎゅうにゅう — milk
雑誌	ざっし — magazine
来る	くる — to come

I'm Yuuki, a Japanese teacher based in Tokyo. I've taught on italki as a Top 1% teacher and watched over 1,500 anime, and I still catch myself pausing on this one in English — because "I like reading and movies" genuinely does not tell you whether that's the whole list, and Japanese always makes you say which one it is.

Book a trial lesson · $13

Sources: the author's own lessons and standard reference grammars.

More drills like the ones above, plus a timed JLPT-style mock test: Practice · N4 · Read something at this level: JLPT N4 stories with audio

More “Grammar, One Piece at a Time” articles →

Want to try this in a real conversation?

30-minute trial lesson, $13. Times shown in your own timezone.

Practice it out loud with a Tokyo native. ★5.0 from 358 italki reviews.

See how the lessons work →

Book a trial lesson · $13